O'Neil Wallace & Doyle, PC

Premises Liability Update:

The Uncertain Future of Lugo

CASE INFORMATION

Name: AHLAM KANDIL-ELSAYED v. F&E OIL, INC.

Court/Judge: Michigan Supreme Court – Order on Application for Leave to Appeal.

Issued: February 4, 2022

INTRODUCTION

Following our prior Newsletter on the Court of Appeals decision in this case,  the saga continues in what could be a signficant paradigm shift in premises liability law. In essence, the outcome of this case could considerably reduce the protections in the Open and Obvious Doctrine and prevent the future application of Lugo v Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich 512 (2001). Presently, this case is proceeding through the Michigan Supreme Court where Lugo, one of the central authorities for premises liability in Michigan since 2001, is under review. Specifically, Lugo addressed the "effectively unavoidable" exception to the Open and Obvious Doctrine with respect to a pothole in the defendant's parking lot. In Lugo,the Court found that the pothole did not have any special characteristics to make it unavoidable, so the Open and Obvious Doctrine barred the plaintiff's claim. The Court also found that comparative negligence did not apply because application of the Open and Obvious Doctrine should be determined on the objective nature of the condition.

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE IN AHLAM KANDIL-ELSAYED v. F&E OIL, INC.

On February 4, 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an Order considering an Application for Leave in this case. Critically, the Order requests supplemental briefing on the following issues:

  1. Whether there was a question of fact if the parking lot in this case constituted an effectively unavoidable condition;
  2. Whether Lugo v Ameritech Corp, Inc is consistent with Michigan's comparative negligence framework; and
  3. Which approach should be adopted for analyzing premises liability cases under a comparative negligence framework.

As you can gather, the way that the Court has framed the issues on appeal provides uncertainty as to Lugo's application to current and future parking lot cases. One one hand, the Open and Obvious Doctrine may gain a comparative negligence component and enhance the protections for property owners. On the other, the decision may modify or eliminate the "effectively unavoidable" exception and lessen the previous protections afforded to property owners potentially increasing liability exposure. 

This is a case that has certaintly garnered our continued attention, and we will keep our readers updated on further developments in this case.

 

  • Name: Andary v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et. al. Court: Michgian Court of Appeals Issued: August 25, 2022 INTRODUCTION The Michigan Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion in Andary v....
    Published: 8/29/2022
  • IME Conditions may Include Video Recording CASE INFORMATION Name: Schaumann- Beltran v. Gemmete Court/Judge: Michigan Supreme Court – Order on Application for Leave to Appeal. Issued: May 13, 2022...
    Published: 6/23/2022
  • MICHIGAN NO-FAULT UPDATE: CLAIMS HANDLING AFTER AN IME Name: RAMIREZ C. HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Court/Judge: Michigan Court of Appeals, unpublished Per Curiam Opinion of Judge Boonstra, Judge...
    Published: 3/14/2022
  • THE RECREATIONAL LAND USE ACT DOES NOT EXTEND TO MAN-MADE CHANGES TO LAND CASE INFORMATION Name: DOREEN ROTT v. ARTHUR ROTT Court/Judge: Michigan Supreme Court – Opinion by Justice WELCH and...
    Published: 8/28/2021
  • PREMISES LIABILIY: NO STATUTORY CLAIMS FOR NON LESSEES CASE INFORMATION Name: Walker v. Hela Mgmt, LLC Court/ Judges: Michigan Court of Appeals –Unpublished Per Curium Opinion by Judges...
    Published: 8/28/2021
  • Open and Obvious Hazards While Entering the Workplace may be Effectively Unavoidable CASE INFORMATION Name: ESTATE OF DONNA LIVINGS v SAGE'S INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC Court/ Judge: Michigan Supreme...
    Published: 7/9/2021
  • PIP Update: Supreme Court Sets Limitations on Insurer's Remedy of Rescission for Post-Application Fraud CASE INFORMATION Name: Meemic Ins. Co. v. Fortson et al. Court/Judge: Michigan Supreme Court...
    Published: 9/18/2020
  • Replacement Cost Does Not Include the Diminution in Value for PPI Claims under the No Fault Act CASE INFORMATION Name: JF Warren, LLC et al. v. Consolidated Ins. Co. , Docket No. 347762 Court/Judge:...
    Published: 7/30/2020
  • No Business Interruption Coverage During COVID-19 Shutdowns CASE INFORMATION Name: Gavrilides Management Co. v Michigan Insurance Co. , Docket No. 20-000258-CB Court/Judge: 30 th Circuit Court,...
    Published: 7/30/2020
  • Michigan Updates to Commerical General Liability Coverage "Accident" is expanded to encompass the insured's work damaged by a subcontractor CASE INFORMATION Name: Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v. M.A.P....
    Published: 7/24/2020
  • Tobin Dust joins O'Neill, Wallace & Doyle, P.C. We are pleased to announce that Tobin Dust of Dust & Campbell, P.C., will be joining our firm effective November 1, 2019. The move will provide...
    Published: 9/26/2019
  • THE GOOD AND THE BAD… AS WE SEE IT FOR THE 2019 AMENDMENT TO THE MICHIGAN NO-FAULT ACT INTRODUCTION The newly amended No-Fault Act made significant changes to Michigan auto-insurance requirements....
    Published: 7/31/2019
  • Negligence (Minors) Update-- " Child's Play ": Court of Appeals Upholds the Reasonable 13-year-old Standard Set Forth in Ray v. Swager. Abuaita v Abuaita Introduction In a negligence action,minors...
    Published: 6/13/2019
  • Premises Liability Update--Court of Appeals Expands Defenses for Landlords to Statutory Slip-and-Fall Claims Y ork v Berger Realty Group, Inc. Introduction The Open and Obvious Doctrine is not a...
    Published: 6/13/2019
  • No-Fault Update—Mayor of Detroit Pursues Action to Declare the Michigan No-Fault Act Unconstitutional Duggan v. McPharlin Introduction Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan filed an action to have the...
    Published: 4/26/2019
  • No-Fault Update--The Michigan Court of Appeals Reviews Voluntary Payments of an Insurer as Admissions of an Injury Ross v Dyment , Dkt. No. 341273 (Mich Ct. App. March 14, 2019) Introduction...
    Published: 4/18/2019
  • No-Fault Update—The Michigan Court of Appeals Reviews Balance Bills and Fraud in Personal Injury Protection ("PIP") Claims The Michigan Court of Appeals recently issued two opinions impacting...
    Published: 3/15/2019